🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue worked, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to restart discussions with the US government. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is walking a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president claiming the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if talks restart.

The American leader last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from Washington either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He said the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had always sought to enforce their desires during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the primary resolution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and respect, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the face of this assault."